History and Theory: The Salt and Pepper of Architecture

Posted: July 12, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,

History and theory are the salt and pepper of architecture. They can go hand in hand but are two complete different components. History tells what has happened based on facts and chronological events. Theory touches base with a much greater depth of concept. It is true that theory often explains history, and that theories are often based on the events of the past, it is important to acknowledge the difference between the two.

Theory is a belief based on an interpretation of a situation, event, phenomena, or group of facts. Architectural theories justify the reasoning behind the work of an architect. It takes under consideration the rules of behavior, society, the economy, and industry, not just rules of building. Theory is rhetorical, for it is meant to persuade others into accepting the theory as a truth. Theory is based on interpretation of facts, not facts themselves. This is where it differs greatest from history.

Architectural history tells of different eras and styles of architecture. History tells of the technology of the particular time, and of the methods used in the building process. Theory on the other hand tells why things were done the way they were done throughout history. Theory tells why a certain style was believed to be the best for the situation. As theory is the “why” of architecture, history is its “how” and “what”.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s